2 |
Fostering student engagement with feedback: an integrated approach
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
5 |
Responding to supervisory feedback: Mediated positioning in thesis writing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
10 |
“The goal of this analysis …”: Changing patterns of metadiscursive nouns in disciplinary writing.
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
11 |
International publishing as a networked activity: Collegial support for Chinese scientists
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
12 |
A tale of two genres: Engaging audiences in academic blogs and three-minute thesis presentations
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
14 |
Academic naming: Changing patterns of noun use in research writing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
15 |
The Covid infodemic: Competition and the hyping of virus research
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
17 |
“I believe the findings are fascinating”: stance in Three-Minute Theses
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
18 |
Elements of doctoral apprenticeship: community feedback and the acquisition of writing expertise
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
19 |
“There are significant differences…”: the secret life of existential there in academic writing
|
|
|
|
Abstract:
While numerous interactive aspects of academic writing have attracted attention in recent years, one common feature which has escaped scrutiny is "existential there" (as in "there are significant differences"). Based on a corpus of 80 research articles from four disciplines, this study explores the 'secret life' of this construction, revealing how academic writers use it to organise their arguments and persuade peers of their claims. In contrast to the style guides which regard existential there as an "empty structure" to be avoided, our data show that academic authors make considerable use of it across different sections of the research article to achieve their persuasive purposes. We also discuss differences in how writers in different disciplines favour diverse accompanying head nouns to foreground the particular aspect of information their readers are likely to find most familiar and persuasive. We conclude that existential there is a key feature in the academic author's rhetorical toolbox, allowing them to build interaction with readers and claim credit for their ideas. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
|
|
URL: https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/72953/ https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/id/eprint/72953/1/Accepted_Manuscript.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102758
|
|
BASE
|
|
Hide details
|
|
20 |
The communication of expertise: changes in academic writing
|
|
|
|
BASE
|
|
Show details
|
|
|
|